Book Review: Mark Chernow Hamilton part 1, half way through

The broadway play is coming to Denver next year, I wanted to be prepared knowing the back story. Hamilton sounds like a prodigy. I’m half way through now, covering his upbringing, his parents situation and his becoming an orphan in St. Croix at age 14. Becoming a clerk for a local accountant, he began to understand trade, smuggling and customs. The West Indies are a major sugar producer, called white gold, it was in high demand. The West Indies were also a port of entry for African Slaves necessary for the sugar production. Hamilton saw all this and likely formed his abolitionist stance early on. 

 

Beginning to write for local newspapers, he is noticed for his advanced ideas and offered a scholarship in a northeastern college. Choosing between Princeton and Kings college, he chose the later entering at the old age of 18. Most students entered at age 12 or 13. But Hamilton, smallish and delicate fudged his age to 15 and began his studies. Ambitious and seeking fame, he joins the Patriots as an infantry officer as part of the New York regiment. Distinguishing himself both as an officer and an intellectual knowing multiple languages. He is reassigned to Washington’s staff for 4 years. Not satisfied, he longs to further distinguish himself in combat and forces Washington to allow him to assume command as a Colonel leading an artillery commander earning fame in Yorktown establishing himself as a Revolutionary war hero at the age of 25. Pretty incredible. 

 

Following the war, he observes the elite are in the law profession, not taking the traditional route by clerking for an established lawyer, he’s self-educates himself and passes the bar establishing his own practice in New York City. Marrying into a leading New York family, the Schuyler’s. 

 

Incredible man with intellect and ambition. He was both lucky and opportunistic he rose to the top of American power and influence all by the time he was 32 years old. 

Read More 0 Comments

Making of a smart home

Home automation through the use of remotes, light timers and motion sensors has always been interesting to me. Combining this with some of the newest technologies from leading Tech companies, I wanted to jump in. While still early days IMO, we’re a long way from the complexity of X10 technologies. Wanting to step in with a system compatible with *most* technologies, I chose the Lutron Caseta system since it worked with both my security system and Apple’s HomeKit. Also supported by automation scripting capabilities like IFTTT, I figured I’d have a lot of options. 

 

Replacing four switches with Caseta dimmers, I can now remotely control and automate lighting in my home. I also added a couple more manual dimmers in locations that I didn’t think automation would be needed. I can imagine a day when its normal for entire houses are connected realizing that its already happening. Pretty incredible how fast this technology is maturing. The installation was easy, same as replacing any light switch. I needed new switch plates. Something we needed anyway since the existing ones are pretty basic. The manual controls allow you to use them immediately. But Caseta requires a smart hub to enable automation and remote control. My first hub worked with the luton app and my security system but wasn’t the version that worked with HomeKit even though the model # and box said it did. Returning and purchasing a new one corrected this. 

Read More 0 Comments

Book Review: Jennifer Keishin Armstrong Seinfeldia

Behind the scenes view of the story focusing on its reflection of real life experiences of Larry David and Jerry Seinfeld at the beginning and then of the writers as it gained traction and was picked up. The book focused on the cultural impact its had, how it lasted 9 years. the decision to stop and the lasting affect its had 18 years since. The stories are well know since I also keep 7 episodes on my DVR to watch regularly. Though dated, its still funny and fun to watch. Finding the @Seinfeld2000 and @SeinfeldToday Twitter feed and learning the stories behind them is a great way to laugh about the show today imagining new stories that ring true to real life. 

Read More 0 Comments

Commentary: Chalmers Johnson Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire

Makes a lot of cases for American imperialism and unfair treatment of emerging countries. Johnson presents the American version of colonialism and the results we're experiencing in our relationships with other countries around the world. Johnson is specific interpreting American actions from our history from the perspective of the local domestic population.

 

Note: I did not complete the book, just half. The aggressive, argumentative tone of the book made it difficult to keep reading. 

Read More 0 Comments

Book Review: Mark Greaney Commander in Chief

Set in 2016 it imagines a Russian, Putin type character dealing with a struggling economy hurt by falling oil prices and economic sanctions because of their take over of the Eastern half of Ukraine including Crimea. 

 

The ‘spy stuff’ deals with money laundering and investment schemes by Russian oligarchy, specifically “Velodin” moving his $8B in personal wealth as insurance in case things go south. Velodin, to gain stature, he threatens Lithuania in order to secure controlled access to Russian access to Kaliningrad. The geo-politics resemble our current situation.

 

The political-stuff deals with Jack Ryan as the US President building a case for NATO involvement to protect and defend the new member state. He describes the supposed/likely reactions from different member states focusing on passive countries like Denmark, US Allies like Great Britain and practical responses like Germany. In the end, the US is going it alone. Positioning troops from the region in Lithuania in advance of a full-on invasion. The battle turns out to be traditional kinetic tank battle with the specter of nuclear war with advanced submarines positioned off the US East coast. 

 

It tells a tale of what could be, entertaining and reflective of our current world situation. 

Read More 0 Comments

Book Review: Fareed Zakaria The Post American World

The Post American World is an optimistic book about the rise of what we considered before as "emerging countries". The Rise of the Rest is the subtext. Their influence is changing geo-politics and the world economy. The US needs to pay attention, cooperate and maintain our own strong economy to remain relevant in this changing world. The book creates a tension between nationalism and globalism that isn't resolved. Both are strong forces, the US remains the model but other cultures interpret and implement their own versions. This view coupled with Chalmer Johnson's presentation of past US interference in other nations paints a picture of warning that dictates that we should focus on our own economy and establish peer relationships for mutual benefit in order to maintain our position of influence. Free trade is at the center but also is the need to have a strong economy at home. Not covered are the content details of these agreements. (My opinion) Free trade works when all are playing by the same rules with the same abilities as an economy. I wonder why each president, regardless of party pushes free-trade agreements such as NAFTA and TPP and if their content is similar. What makes these essential to each president but controversial to legislators at the same time?  

Read More 0 Comments

Book Review: Joseph Wheelan Jefferson's War America's First War on Terror 1801-1805

up to 4 hours in) The book is setting the stage for Muslim (the Moors) expulsion from Spain to Northern Africa and Europe's relationship with the nations along the Barbary Coast: Tunis, Algeria and Morocco. The author describes the conditions of trade, the difficulties of movement, the practice of piracy and slavery by those nations. It was incredibly brutal. The European States sought to placate and pay tribute rather than to build defenses and stand united. In contrast, the states along the Barbary Coast, did unite and represent each other's interests comparing and colluding on 'tribute' payments. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson - ambassadors to Brittan and France respectively were witness to the economic impacts and the deliberations by those countries toward their Mediterranean neighbors. The relationship of Christian and Muslim was fresh and sharply divided. East and West, Europe to the Ottoman Empire cultures clashed. 
Its setting up that peace cannot be sought, when payment is made the 'booty' isn't distributed down as when it captured. So you have sailors/warriors unrest looking for payment and bounty. This sets up America's first foreign war, creation and establishment of the Marines and Navy. 
The rest of the story discusses the establishment of the US Navy the American's introduction on to the world stage. The US military leadership being mostly based on the British military began to create their own identity, while retaining much of the convention. American independence was driving it from succumbing to payment of tribute to as a means of settling disputes with the Barbary nations of Morocco, Algeria, Tunis and Tripoli. Contrary to the European nations approach of tribute payments and appeasement, the United States preferred War over Tribute. Maybe because we had a national debt of $83M when Jefferson took office in the Spring of 1803 and we didn't have the funds.
The war: War with Tripoli focused on the capture of the Philadelphia and her crew. The conditions they were under were brutal. That with a crew of over 300 was reduced to 5 by the end of their imprisonment and slavery. That their captain surrendered rather than fight after he ran the ship aground. Rescue and repatriation became a goal. William Eaton built a foreign army led them through the desert from Alexandria Egypt to Daria Bengazi and took that city. The act that caused Tripoli to surrender settling the dispute and establishing the US as a legitimate military power. As an aside, William Eaton seemed like an impressive leader and person. His language skills, ability to adapt to the local culture, lead and win battles were impressively described. Bainbridge seemed like a smart person who lacked common sense.
Jefferson's presidency: Thomas Jefferson ran as a Republican distinguishing himself from Adams a Federalist as someone who believed in limited government and state's rights. At the beginning of his presidency, he didn't believe in building a Navy, by the end - he had and used it beyond our shores. His first election resulted in an electoral tie with Aaron Burr. The tie wasn’t broken until congress weighed in with 38 votes finally giving it to Jefferson having turned a Representative from New Hampshire. Aaron Burr having been charged with the murder of Alexander Hamilton after a duel. began building support for taking Texas from Mexico and independence of Western states (beyond the Appalachian mountains) from the US. The 'coup' failed lacking complicit military leadership from characters that included Andrew Jackson. Jefferson's change seemed to be evidence of the reality of the office versus campaign beliefs (or promises). 

 

In the end, the US took offensive action and won their trade security. We created a legitimate Navy and learned to protect our interests beyond our borders. giving us the ability to conduct free trade with Europe. 
Read More 0 Comments

Book Review: Richard Zaks: The Pirate Coast, Thomas Jefferson, the first Marines and the Secret Mission of 1805

This account focuses on the actions of William Eaton set in the context of post-Revolutionary War America and Europe's relationship with the Barbary cost nations Tripoli, Tunis and Algiers. Interesting were the personalities and the methods they used to travel, gain funding and resolve conflicts. The way they traveled was remarkable, glossed over was the challenges that were presented, coach or horse up and down the coast. The way Washington City was referred to as a swamp with no bridges across the Potomac. The boarding houses that hosted the political leaders and how they were referred to as 'frat' houses. 
The subject of this book centers around the actions of William Eaton in taking Derne by land traveling from Egypt across the desert. This was the first covert mission by the United States. T Jefferson was poised to deny and maintained a distance from the actions even following its success. Eaton was awkward in dealing with his peers. An Army Captain, he took the mission solely out of personal pride and ignorance. He was expendable and not connected to the administration, without official rank or support, he provided clear deny-ability. I don't think many thought he would succeed but were willing to let him try so that we could bargain. 
Politics take center stage throughout. Politics of America wanting to protect its interests, while struggling to establish a name within the world of nations at the time. Politics of the Barbary Coast that clashed Muslim Turks aligned with the Ottomans with Christian Europeans. Tripoli (Lybia) ruling brothers and internal civil war. Navigating these factions provides a good example of "knowing your enemy" and where alliances exist, agree and are working together across groups. Right is not always correct and the ability to win, doesn't always mean you should. Eaton could have taken Tripoli after the victory at Derne but that wasn't the goal. America didn't seek an African Colony - rather we wanted free trade in the region without tribute because we couldn't afford it. 
Personalities and vice drove much of the book, Tobias Lear, a Washington confidant was well connected and shrewd. Eaton was bullheaded and rash. The Navy was king and ground forces were expendable. Alcohol was used heavily. Eaton was a heavy drinker in an age of heavy drinking. It destroyed his reputation and financial situation. eventually killing him. A tragic story. Interesting that Lear committed suicide and so many died in duels for honor. Seems silly now, but tempers and offenses are still deadly but more likely to happen behind a wheel than a pistol. 
Read More 0 Comments

Thoughts on America’s first foreign war

People have been living and interacting with each other for thousands of years. Someone once said that history may not repeat but it does rhyme. Looking at current events in light of our history helps me understand the context for what we’re seeing today. For instance, America is still suffering the effects of slavery that was abolished more than 100 years ago. The specific history of slavery may not be forefront in everyone’s minds, but its affects are. Past down through actions of prejudice, discrimination and distrust. The same is true with the West’s interactions with the Arab and Persian peoples. This history goes back to the beginnings of time but events such as the Christian Crusades, European colonization of the middle east and Africa. Europe’s war against the Ottoman Empire and the Barbary Coast are directly related to these actions and affect the West’s relationship today. The parallels are clear and though the history isn’t as well known, the beliefs are past down from generations to generation. We are dealing with it today. Just like slavery in America. We can’t apologize our way out of it, nor can we fight our way out of it. We are stuck trying to contain the violence, and look for small ways to change our relationships with these nations. 
I’ve read 2 books in the past month dealing with America’s war with the Barbary States of Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli (Libya) in the first year’s of our existence. And the offensive campaign we sought against Tripoli in 1805 to end tribute payments (since we didn’t have the funds and were $83M in debt from the Revolutionary war). And to enable free trade in the region. Richard Zaks: The Pirate Coast, Thomas Jefferson, the first Marines and the Secret Mission of 1805 dealt with William Eaton’s campaign against Derne. And Joseph Wheelan Jefferson's War America's First War on Terror 1801-1805 looked at the situation more broadly describing our policies and interactions in greater context.
I’ve written detailed notes and reviews on both books, if I get comments on this blog, I’ll post them.  
Read More 0 Comments

Review: Stephen Ambrose: Undaunted Courage, the story of Lewis and Clark

Wow, what an adventure! There is much to be intrigued about with this story, the perspective of the first group to document the voyage west. The historical context, their beliefs, prejudice, expectations and methods. Certainly others were there first, but this was the first American experience documented so completely to provide detailed understanding. That they completed the trip was incredible given the challenges and threats they faced. Having traveled through South Dakota, Montana, across Idaho and Oregon (on paved roads) and marked trails, this is pretty remote and challenging terrain. The descriptions in the book are accurate today. A couple years ago, I coasted into Choteau, Montana almost out of gas and no cell signal until I reached the town. I was nervous about getting stuck. By the way, Choteau is named after a member of their expedition, a French trapper who was able to provide translation services with native peoples.
Interesting elements included
  • Their preparation, learning what they brought, what was available to them and how they used it.
  • What they expected, thinking there were mammoth's, that the western range, the Rockies had similar traits to the Appalachians, their expectations of the natives
  • Thomas Jefferson's political realities and personal motivations and methods
  • The medicine they used
  • What and how they ate
  • Their reception and observations of natives relative to their expectations. How they changed.
  • The realities of slave ownership
  • Their description of the geography given their 18th/19th century world views

Overall an incredible, real life adventure with a tragic ending with parallels to our life. Lessons on leadership, on our adherence to our plans filtered through out biases, our personal vices the realities of depression and drug abuse.  
Read More 0 Comments